Leading Jewish Supremacist magazine Commentary–described as the single journal which has been “consistently influential or so central to the major debates that have transformed the political and intellectual life of the United States”–has spewed bile over Dr. David Duke’s comments on the decision by the Presbyterian Church (USA) to disinvest from the racist state of Israel.
In an article penned by Peter Wehner, a former White House staffer and a servile Goyim bought and paid for by the Jewish Lobby, Commentary magazine had the following to say about Dr. Duke and the Presbyterian Church’s decision:
David Duke and the Presbyterian Church (USA) Join In Common Cause Against Israel
Those who support what happened last week will undoubtedly argue that this was an example of them acting in a way that manifests their faith and their concern for social justice. In fact, it’s evidence of a hollowing out of their faith and required them to disfigure the real meaning of justice. It is hardly an accident that one of those who praised the PCUSA for its actions was none other than David Duke.
In a statement posted on his website, Duke said, “Israel is based not only on ethnic supremacism, but on massive terrorism and ethnic cleansing. … Their racist power over the media and government is why Israel can get away with it all. But people can stand up. Bravo to the Presbyterian Church for standing up to Jewish racism and supremacism!”
Well done, Presbyterian Church (USA). David Duke has found in your organization a moral voice and a moral home.
You can have him.
Commentary magazine also posted a link to the article on Dr. Duke’s website, which allowed a large number of readers to see for themselves what else was said on the topic.
Note that there is no attempt to either question the motivation of the Presbyterian Church, or to analyze the facts which led them to their decision.
There is also not the slightest attempt to address or answer any of the points raised by Dr. Duke.
Instead, the “criticism” is limited to a purely ad-hominen personal attack on Dr. Duke, with the “rationale” amounting to the following: “David Duke agrees, therefore it is wrong.”
Fortunately, the internet has made it possible for all open-minded people to see exactly what the truth is, and no longer do they have to rely on what the Jewish Supremacist controlled media tells them is the “truth.”
* Commentary is a monthly journal devoted to politics and Judaism. Founded by the American Jewish Committee in 1945, it originally was a Communist Party-supporting magazine, which later tried to avoid being blamed for Josef Stalin’s excesses by claiming to be “anti-Stalinist” and instead supporting the Jewish Leon Trotsky (Bronstein) version of world Marxism.
By the 1980s, the magazine had been moved the “right” under its editor Norman Podhoretz, transforming the former Communist journal into a “neo-conservative” publication, following the track of many other Jewish neocons who also “converted” from Trotskyism to “conservatism.”
All of this posturing was, of course, merely a cover for the Jewish Supremacist trick of dominating both the “left” and the “right” of the controlled political spectrum offered to American voters as their “choice”—while all sides worked together to support and cover up for the racist state of Israel.
The fact that Commentary magazine has seen fit to link to and comment on Dr. Duke’s writings is yet another indication of the power of the Internet to undermine the Jewish Supremacist control of the traditional mass media.
