By Dr. David Duke. The horror of ISIS terror which has unfolded across media outlets over the past few days is the product of years of intrigue, subversion, torture, terrorism and wars, all caused by the Jews-only state of Israel and the Jewish Lobby which controls the US government.
The entire Muslim world has been radicalized over a period of at least two decades—if not more—by a series of planned, deliberate actions, all initiated by the Zio-Supremacist fanatics who seek to spread disunity, infighting and turmoil among all non-Jews, and particularly those neighboring their international headquarters of Israel.
These planned actions include the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, the torture of Palestinians and even Iraqis (at Abu Gharib) by Zio-extremists, support for the Syrian “rebels”—now revealed as ISIS, and the outright control of the US government to support the Israeli Holocaust and ethnic cleansing against Palestinians.
All of these events have created an atmosphere of hatred—in which the Zio-extremists thrive—between non-Jews, and especially against Americans and Europeans in general, who the Muslim world perceives as supporting the ongoing reign of terror by the Jews-only state of Israel. In fact, it misdirects Arab and Muslim anger from Israel and the world Zionist influence to America, the UK and the rest of the Western World.
1. The Invasion of Afghanistan
The invasion of Afghanistan was presented to the world as a “reaction” to the attacks of September 11, 2001. It was claimed—by the Jewish Supremacist dominated George Bush administration—that the Taliban was involved in the attacks and was deliberately sheltering Osama Bin Laden.
Despite there being in reality no evidence at all that Afghanistan or the Taliban were involved in the events of 9-11, an American military invasion was duly launched, all in line with a Jewish Supremacist plan hatched in 1996 by the Israeli think tank, “The Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS),” and spelled out in their briefing paper titled “A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm.” A key part of that plan was changing America’s non-involvement strategy, and because Osama bin Laden was hiding in the mountains of Afghanistan, that was used as a pretext to invade the whole country.
Demanding that the Taliban turn over bin Laden was ridiculous as they had no ability to do that anymore than America had the ability to do it in 9 years of effort in Afghanistan. But the invasion of Afghanistan set the stage for even more American involvement against perceived enemies of Israel in the middle east, including war against an American ally, Iraq, because Iraq was anti-Israel and supported the Palestinians.
The IASPS conference study group leader was a Jewish neocon named Richard Perle, and another Jewish neocon named Douglas Feith. Both the Jewish Supremacists then emerged as key players in the Bush administration: Perle was Chairman of George Bush’s Defense Policy Board Advisory Committee, and Feith became Under Secretary of Defense and the Pentagon’s Policy Advisor.
The invasion, launched in 2001, has become one of America’s most costly and lengthy wars ever. It is now in its thirteenth year and although US troops are officially slated to withdraw this year, there is no real end in sight.
Tens of thousands of completely innocent Afghanis have been killed, and hundreds of thousands—if not millions—more have been radicalized into supporting groups such as ISIS. And the Jewish lobby’s warmongering is solely to blame.
2. The Invasion of Iraq.
The invasion of Iraq was presented—by the same Jewish neocons who generated the war against Afghanistan—as necessary because Saddam Hussein was allegedly involved in the attacks of 9-11, and because he had “nuclear weapons, chemical weapons” and other “weapons of mass destruction” which he was about to launch on the west.
In reality, Saddam had none of these weapons—as was later proven—and had nothing to with 9-11. In reality, Saddam was an enemy of Osama Bin Laden, who described the Iraqi leader in taped messages as an “infidel” who needed to be killed.
The only state to which Saddam was hostile, was the Jewish tribalist Zionist state of Israel—and for that reason alone, he was singled out for destruction by the Zio-puppets in Washington D.C.. In fact, Saddam Hussein ran a secular state and was opposed to al Qaeda and Arab radicalism. The invasion of Iraq unleashed the al Qaeda radical elements in the country.
The Jewish neo-con involvement in the Iraq war is well-known, and was most recently exposed by America’s famous journalist, Carl Bernstein, who first sprang to prominence as the exposer of the Watergate scandal which brought down former president Richard Nixon.
Bernstein, himself Jewish, speaking in the Joe Scarborough show on NBC during a debate over the Bush legacy, openly stated that “Jewish neocons” (neoconservatives) were behind the war against Iraq.
Over a million innocent people were killed as a result of the invasion of Iraq. Once again, this action unquestionably radicalized millions more into supporting groups such as ISIS. And, just like Afghanistan, the Jewish lobby’s warmongering is exclusively to blame.
3. Torture in Israel.
A feature article by Joel Greenburg in the very pro-Israel New York Times titled “Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs,” stated matter-of-factly that Israel tortures 500 to 600 Palestinians every month.
That figure, which is probably too low, bearing in mind that it comes from the Jewish Supremacist New York Times, means that each year at least 6,000 Palestinians are tortured in Israel.
Torture of Palestinians has been going on in Israel since 1948. Even if one uses just one-half of the number of Palestinians that Greenburg says suffer torture each year — at least 150,000 human beings have been tortured in Israeli jails since the founding of the Jewish state, and likely the numbers are a lot higher.
This alone would serve to radicalize millions of Palestinians and Muslims throughout the entire Middle East—but, as the Abu Gharib example, shows, these Zio-fanatics cannot even stop there.
4. Torture at Abu Gharib, Iraq.
The exposure of the horrible torture used on Iraqis detained at the Abu Gharib prison remains one of the greatest black marks against the US invasion of that country—if one discounts the invasion itself.
However, the Jewish Supremacist-controlled media—which gave plenty of coverage to the exposure of the prison—almost completely blacked out the reality that Jewish Supremacists were once again behind the outrages.
The key figure at Abu Ghraib was a shadowy, “third country national” named John Israel. Here are excerpts from an article by Robert Fisk of Britain’s The Independent titled “The re-writing of Iraqi history is now going on at supersonic speed” (26 May 2004):
And let’s cast our eyes upon that little, all-important matter of responsibility. The actual interrogators accused of encouraging U.S. troops to abuse Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib jail were working for at least one company with extensive military and commercial contacts with Israel. The head of an American company whose personnel are implicated in the Iraqi tortures, it now turns out, attended an “anti-terror” training camp in Israel and, earlier this year, was presented with an award by Shaul Mofaz, the right-wing Israeli defense minister…
A July 3, 2004 report by Britain’s BBC titled “Israeli interrogators ‘in Iraq’” was subtitled “The US officer at the heart of the Abu Ghraib prison scandal says she has evidence that Israelis helped to interrogate Iraqis.”
Once again, how could such outrages have any other effect except to radicalize millions—against America?
And, like the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Jewish Lobby is completely to blame.
5. Support for the Syrian “Rebels”
When the so-called “rebellion” against the Syrian government first started, the Jewish Lobby in America and the Israeli state openly declared their support for the “rebels” and did everything in their power to ensure that the US government armed, financed and supported them.
Syria’s great “sin”, of course, was the fact that Basheer Assad is hostile to the Jewish racist tribalist state of Israel, and it is in the Jewish Supremacists’ interests to have chaos in Syria rather than a united enemy right on their borders.
As reported in the Times of Israel, all the major Jewish organizations in America “including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, the Zionist Organization of America, Americans for Peace Now and the Anti-Defamation League” took part in lobbying efforts to incite the US government into supporting the rebels and even attacking the Syrian state with American armed forces.
The largest Jewish lobby, AIPAC, was quoted as asking Congress to grant Obama “the authority he has requested to protect America’s national security interests”—without of course saying what those “national security interests” are.
“I would predict that the overwhelming majority of the American Jewish community will support the president’s decision on moral grounds and national security grounds,” Abraham Foxman, the ADL’s national director, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.
Fortunately, the Internet managed to undermine the Zio-lies about “chemical weapons” in Syria, and American military intervention was prevented. But they succeeded completely in arming and funding the “rebels” with enough sophisticated weapons for the “rebellion” in Syria to have dragged on long enough so that a recent UN Report has stated that over 190,000 people have now been killed in that country.
Once again, the Jewish Supremacists are behind all of the war-mongering against Syria.
In September 2013, a large number of senior analysts, CIA officers, senior U.S. military personnel, judges and even the Deputy National Intelligence Officer for the Middle East wrote an open letter to Obama warning that the “intelligence” being used to promote an attack on Syria is “dubious” because it comes from Israel.
An article which appeared in the New York Times of September 5, 2013, quoted Alon Pinkas, a former Israeli consul general in New York as follows about the “civil war” in Syria:
“This is a playoff situation in which you need both teams to lose, but at least you don’t want one to win — we’ll settle for a tie. Let them both bleed, hemorrhage to death: that’s the strategic thinking here. As long as this lingers, there’s no real threat from Syria.”
And so the Obama administration, following its orders from the Jewish Lobby, armed the rebels—even though it was clear very early on in the “rebellion” that they were dominated by ISIS fanatics who beheaded and crucified Christians—and, incredibly, were literally mass-murdering cannibals. The invaders of Syria Zio-controlled America supported literally made videos of eating the hearts of their enemies.
Despite all this evidence, even the Christian Zionist leaders in America joined in with the Jewish Supremacists in demanding that the US government back the “rebels”—and hence it is now ironically tragic that these same Christian leaders are now decrying the nightmare which their Jewish Supremacist-directed policies have now unleashed in Iraq.
These five major events outlined above have together created a poisonous brew of hatred, extremism and murderous violence –and it is ordinary Americans like James Foley—among thousands of others—who have been called upon to pay the price for the Zio-blood lust.
When I was fortunate enough to visit Syria, I met with all the major Christian and Muslim leaders. All of them supported the government, and were well aware of the grave threat posed to them by Islamist extremism.
It is doubly tragic to think about what has happened to them, and the Christians in Iraq, since then. They have been murdered, exiled, forced to convert to Islam, and more. Many of these Christian Zionists also don’t know that large numbers–in some areas, up to a third–of the Palestinians were also Christians.
All the while, those blind Christian Zionists in America and elsewhere continue to support Israel, while it bombs and murders Christians in Palestine and its agents support the anti-Christian “rebels” in Syria and Iraq!
The truth is that the Christians who support Zionist power in the US are literally underwriting the massacre of Christians by ISIS and others. In fact, ISIS is a creation of the US government–because it is unlikely that the “rebels” in Syria would even have lasted this long in Syria had the Obama administration not been pressured by the Jewish lobby into arming them.
Let the whole world–and especially the Muslim world–know: what they perceive to be the actions of the”American” government in the Middle East, no more represents ordinary Americans than does the state of Israel represent the Palestinians.
Both America and Palestine are occupied, by the same Zio-Supremacists whose never-ending hatred, political manipulation and violence lies at the root cause of all the bloodshed we see around us today.