The Killen Case: The Death of Civil Rights in America
UPDATED January 16, 2005
I approach my commentary on the Killen case with more than a bit of trepidation. As a long-ago former Klansman, albeit a non-violent one in an absolutely non-violent Klan, any comments I make on the current murder case against James Killen will be used by some to bring up once more my early Klan involvement and somehow suggest that I condone violence or murder.
It is vital to note that I have always forthrightly condemned violence and that no one ever associated with me or my Klan organization of many years ago has even been accused of violence against any minorities. Let me repeat that, not a single member of my organization was ever accused of any violence. The public still can’t get the idea that there are many different Klans with completely separate leadership that profoundly differ. The fact that any group of misfits today can call themselves a “Klan” and say or do incredibly stupid things (like the type seen on Jerry Springer) was one of the reasons I left and formed a new organization in the 1970s.
The violence that occurred primarily in the 1960s was one of the catalysts to the damaging changes that came about to the European community. Every iota of violence on the part of Whites was exploited by the press to justify the racial integration of the South. To that end there is ample evidence that government informants and agents actually launched, aided, and abetted numerous acts of violence against minorities. This has been documented by the U.S. Congress in their investigation into Cointelpro (or federal counter-intelligence program) that targeted both leftwing and rightwing organizations. Because of 911, the level of government Cointelpro-type activity is now at incredibly high levels. Aside from any moral opposition to gratuitous violence, involvement in such activity today is the quickest and surest way to destroy the Movement for our Heritage and Freedom. In modern case after case, government agents and informants have been the initiators of violence. This is why Zero Tolerance of Violence is an important part of our now quite famous New Orleans Protocol.
The violent events that happened in Philadelphia, Mississippi in 1964 are now more than 40 years old. They are not defensible. Yet, one can understand why they occurred. When a social system in place for hundreds of years is overthrown by force against the overwhelming sentiment of the people, violence is a certain outcome. The amazing thing is that such monumental social changes to the South came without a lot more violence, for far less dramatic social changes in many nations of the world have sparked mass violence that makes the limited violence in the South seem very minor indeed.
In terms of moral relativism, the Civil Rights Movement ultimately caused far more loss of life and limb than did the limited violence in opposition to it. In the South of Jim Crow, black children were relatively safe from violence. They went to their own schools, pretty much associated with their own kind — morning, noon and night. There were no tough, racist White kids to bother them in integrated schools, because there were no integrated schools.
In stark contrast, since the forced integration and busing decreed in the 60s and 70s, there have been millions of White children who have suffered as small minorities in overwhelmingly Black schools. The Black kids grow up with a chronic recital of slavery and a catechism of supposed White wrongs against Blacks. Such naturally inflames many to a deep-seated resentment against Whites. That anger is combined with the fact that young Blacks thrive in gangster rap culture and are far more likely to be criminally violent.
One good measure of the racial violence is a study done of gang assaults. It showed that in attacks involving groups of more than two assailants, Blacks were 200 times more likely to attack White victims than Whites were liable to attack Blacks. 200 times more likely! Egalitarians claim all black violence and crime is due strictly to environment, but a growing scientific contingent says that criminality is more a question of nature rather than nurture. But, while the cause of black violence can be debated, the fact is that Blacks have a much higher rate of criminal violence than Whites. So integration has led directly to a tremendous number of violent attacks on Whites.
It has been shown that many adult teachers live with fear of Black violence in mostly Black schools. What do you suppose the fear level is of the minority of White children who are usually confronted by Blacks who are bigger and more aggressive? The higher Black failure rate itself causes many Blacks to be much older and more physically powerful than their younger White counterparts.
Racial Integration of neighborhoods, communities and schools has made Whites much more accessible to Black violence and criminality and has created literally millions of White victims of Black violence and criminality. Compare the millions of White victims of Black violence to only dozens of victims in Civil Rights Movement.
Here is an up-to-the minute example as shown from an excerpt from a January 16, 2005 newspaper article. You can multiply this incident by the tens of thousands since the 1960s.
Fights at Bear Creek High cause worry
Some fear attacks are racially motivated; school officials say no proof points to that conclusion
By Abbie Dutcher
Record Staff Writer
Published Sunday, January 16, 2005
STOCKTON — Concerns about racial violence are high at Bear Creek High School, where one student was arrested last week and two others have been suspended after attacks on white students, Stockton police and Lodi Unified officials said Friday.
The arrest came after a student was beat up near the school gym on Wednesday. In a separate incident the same day, another teen was attacked in a boys’ bathroom.
In both cases, the victims — ages 15 and 16 — were white and their alleged assailants were Black, police and school officials said.
Both victims suffered minor injuries. School officials say they also have yet to find any videotape of the assaults, even though the victims said their attackers were taping the beatings.
An example of the toll taken is in one of the most heinous crimes, forcible rape. Coinciding with the Civil Rights Movement and integration has been an epidemic increase of Black rape against White women. Blacks rape White women at a rate of at least 25 to 1 as compared to White rape of Black women, that’s a horrendous 2,500 percent higher! 25 percent higher would be bad enough, but 2,500 percent higher is intolerable. Some studies point to a much higher ratio: approximately 150 to 1!
Segregation was portrayed to America as the indignity of Blacks drinking at separate water fountains or attending separate schools. Well, how about the indignity of assault, robbery, rape or murder? We have substituted one supposed moral transgression of separation for what I would think is a far worse form of human oppression. The truth is that in recent times Whites have suffered from physical abuse far more than Blacks did under segregation. In fact, millions of White families don’t even dare to use the public schools. They are under the terrible burden of having to struggle and pay for public education with their taxes and then having to personally finance their child’s education in private or church schools.
I have often made the comparison of the Rosa Parks, “Back of the Bus” issue. It is true that Blacks once rode in the back of the bus. But, at least Rosa could ride on the bus! Since the advent of Civil Rights, in many parts of our major cities Whites don’t dare get on public transport. So Rosa could always get on the bus, but hundreds of thousands of White “Rosa’s” of today can’t even get on the bus for fear of the risk of life and limb.
All of this is extremely politically incorrect to discuss, but I have nothing to lose, I can tell the truth without fear or favor. In our press it is almost as if these wrongs against European-Americans don’t even exist , but millions of Whites are painfully aware of the loss of their civil rights by the so-called “civil rights” as forced upon us by government and media.
So I wanted you to understand why so much opposition existed in the 60s and why millions of White people know today as they did then, that so the so-called Black civil-rights Movement leads to massive denial of civil rights of Whites.
Those violations go far beyond affirmative action. Affirmative action as you must be aware by now is nothing more than naked, rank racial discrimination against Whites who are clearly better qualified than their Black counterparts. The proponents of the Civil Rights Movement reveal their hypocrisy in the utmost clarity. I am reminded of the famous “civil rights” attorney, Alan Dershowitz, who has come out for torture of criminal suspects. And, let’s not forget that this super Jewish supremacist, Dershowitz, is all for the segregation and repression of Palestinians in the Jewish supremacist state of Israel but gallantly for integrating Mississippi.
Two of the people who died in Philadelphia, Mississippi were New York Jews who descended upon the South to give us the civil rights I explained above. Of course, at the same time they came South, the Jewish state of Israel had established the strictest, most Apartheid state in the world. But they weren’t over in Israel fighting for human rights and so-called civil rights but trying to force it down the throats of Southerners who knew better. Everyone condemns their murder of Schwerner and Goodman and Chaney, as they should, but the results of the revolution that they worked for has since resulted in the deaths and injury to tens of thousands of White people across the South and across the nation. The so called Civil Rights Movement spawned a murderous wave of crimes against humanity and civil rights violations that still go on to this very day.
The fact is that Jewish supremacists similar to Schwerner and Goodman have led the so-called Civil Rights Movement from its beginning. Marxist Jews were the founders of the NAACP; they financed the whole Civil Rights Movement. Jewish lawyers fought the federal cases that made integration the law of the land. Franz Boas, and other modern day Jewish supremacists such as Gould, Kamin, Rose and Diamond are the egalitarian high priests. And we must not forget that the overwhelmingly Jewish media has been the force that lied to America about the Civil Rights Movement and still lies to us today. And it is the same media that bleats out unquestioned support for the most racist state on earth: Israel.
Now, with the thousands of unsolved crimes against Whites all over America, what does the government spend years of work and millions of dollars on? Answer, with no new evidence, they decide to retry a decrepit old man who cannot even stand up straight for an offense over 40 years old. It is a political trial for political reasons if ever there was one.
You see, Americans are starting to see the real destruction of human and civil rights brought on by the Civil Rights Movement, but there are no outrages to focus on as the media did in the 60s, so they are dredging up an old wrong to wipe White noses in it and spread the guilt around thick and smelly.
The trial of Edgar Killen is a clear violation of the 5th and 6th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, our nation’s most important statement of civil rights, the Bill of Rights.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.
I approach my commentary on the Killen case with more than a bit of trepidation. As a long ago former Klansman, albeit a non-violent one in an absolutely non-violent Klan, any comments I make on the current murder case against James Killen will be used by some to bring up once more my early Klan involvement and somehow suggest that I condone violence or murder.
In the 5th amendment to the constitution it says an American shall not be tried for the same offense twice. In the 6th it says that an American has the right to a speedy trial.
Our forefathers put those civil rights into our Constitution for good reason. The idea of not being tried for the same offense twice was inserted because tyrannical governments often will keep trying people until they can obtain a conviction. This of course is exactly what has happened to Mr. Killen. He is being tried again for the same underlying offense because it is a politically correct case. And to think that he is being retried 40 years after fact!
The reason why our forefathers put “speedy trial? in the Bill of Rights is simply because justice delayed is justice denied. Most people can’t remember things clearly that happened last month, much less what happened 40 years ago. Memories get mixed up with what people hear from others, what they read and what they see in the intervening time. Furthermore, over such a lengthy time, what happens to evidence that can corroborate a man’s innocence? It is likely lost. For instance, if a man has a solid alibi provided by three or four people, there is now a good chance that they are dead, or if not their memories are faulty after so many years.
This case is not as if DNA evidence has turned up on a hitherto unsuspected murderer many years after the crime. Mr. Killen was tried before and he has been known to Government for all these forty years. Government authorities had the responsibility to try him in a timely manner. The fact that government agencies did not should not make this helpless old man suffer the consequences of a trial held 40 years too late in complete violation of true justice and human rights.
It is one more piece of evidence that the Constitution and our Bill of Rights are just scraps of paper to those who dominate the legal and political process in America. It is one more piece of evidence that in America, real civil rights are dead.