Human Diversity

Genocide, Political Warfare and Bob's Mantra

Political Warfare is Imposing Your Own Terminology

By Bob Whitaker, Reagan-staffer
November 11th, 2006

Yes, when people think of genocide they see heaps of corpses.

Let me explain something about political warfare. We can determine the nature of debate by posting the simple truths about white genocide on web-based discussion forums. I have put together these simple truths in what I call “Bob’s Mantra” (see end of article).

Here is where this insight is so critical. You do not need to say, for example, that the entire British population had begun torchlight parades in favor of the Truth. Instead some have noted a minor but critical sea change.

That, ladies and gentlemen, is what power politics is all about.

If genocide has a stereotype, and we have a definition which even the critics have to admit is valid, we can either try to justify ourselves — which is always fatal — or we can just go on and use the real definition over and over and over and over until that is the accepted definition because it is true.

We are in the process of appropriating their word. If Jews had kept the word “genocide” as a defensive measure they could still have it. But they chose to use it to describe any method by which whites could try to preserve their own kind. In the UN Resolutions they expanded the definition to include anything that whites could conceivably use to save white gentiles.

So the policy they are now pursuing is, by their own definition, genocide.

So now we are supposed to redefine the word to suit them?

No way, Jose!

They stumbled into an exact definition of the genocide they are practicing when they created UN Resolution 260 in 1948, the time of the creation of Israel. They have since expanded its application so they could vent their hatred of white gentiles.

Hate is self-destructive.

Even antiwhites quote chapter and verse to say that I am right, what I describe in the Mantra is genocide. But we are supposed to let them get away with doing away with race on a technicality.

No way, Jose.

As Noah Webster said, language is usage. We are going to use that definition. In the meantime, it will go through the standard stages of being called absurd, being attacked,and being accepted.

I have been here before.


They are trying to do away with my race. That is genocide. Stop quibbling.

Bob, an experienced Reagan-staffer, Congressional aid, Capitol Hill politician, and global intelligence expert has produced the following to simplify strategically our call to secure a future for our children. He designed it for quick posting wherever you can online. Certain words are emphasized all in capitals since it is seldom possible to format comments in Blogs, news sites, and Usenet newsgroups. This strategy of copying and relaying critical facts is the same as used in the Soviet samizdat that sparked the collapse of the Soviet Union — it is REVOLUTIONARY.

Bob’s Mantra

Liberals and respectable conservatives say there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.

The Netherlands and Belgium are more crowded than Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.

Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.

What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?

How long would it take anyone to realize I am not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?

And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?

But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.

They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


From: Bob’s Blog
Kevin Alfred Strom’s interview with Prof. Bob Whitaker on American Dissident Voices: Text | MP3

About Bob

Robert W. Whitaker has “been there and done that” in the world of politics. His unique perspective is insightful and vital. You may not agree with everything he says, but I guarantee that he will make you think.

Bob was born and raised in South Carolina, went to the University of South Carolina and the University of Virginia Graduate School. He has been a college professor, international aviation negotiator, Capitol Hill senior staffer, Reagan Administration appointee, and writer for the

Voice of America. He has written numerous articles and two books. Bob now lives in Columbia, SC. He has asked me to inform female readers that he is divorced and “wildly attractive.” I agree that he is divorced.

Three of Bob Whitaker’s razor-sharp books are listed on The first two are also available at quality brick and mortar stores or all three can be ordered there for you.

(A milestone in the campaign against both the liberal establishment and watered-down conservatism)
(Explains the racial populist strategy which led to the victory of populist-sounding Reagan in 1980)
(Bob Whitaker’s deadliest book, which blows the lid off the politically correct professor-priesthood)