President Bush addresses joint session of Congress after 9/11
“Why do they Hate us?…they hate our freedoms…” No they don’t Mr. President, They hate Israel’s control of U.S. Policy!
Final 9/11 Commission Report says U.S. Israeli Policy Prime Motivation for the Attack!
Americans are asking, why do they hate us? They hate what we see right here in this chamber — a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms — our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other. — President Bush in address to joint session of Congress on September 20, 2001.
David Duke in an article published on September 13, 2001 — I believe that time will prove that this attack, if committed by Muslims, was motivated by America’s Israeli-controlled foreign policy. When will Americans truly understand the terrible damage that the Jewish supremacists have done to this nation? The media and politicians can’t afford to connect 9/11 to our Israeli occupied territory (the Congress). Too many Americans might ask, “Is it worth it? Is Israel worth the damage inflicted upon our nation, the innocent lives lost, the careers and financial hardship, the hatred directed at Americans around the world?
Then again, after Bush’s blatant deception before Congress I wrote the the following on September 22, 2001 — I am, just like every American, appalled by the 9/11 attack. But a time like this is not a time for deception. It is not a time for blatant lies. Hating our democratic freedoms is not a motivation for bin Laden or the hijackers. You can read bin Laden’s own words as recorded by America’s mass media. He never spoke a word against our democracy. What he hates is our support of the criminal actions of Israel and the fact that we have let ourselves be manipulated into anti-Arab actions by Israel, such as in the Iraq embargo and blockade…We were not attacked because we are free. On the contrary, we were attacked because we are NOT, because our nation’s foreign policy is controlled by a foreign power that leads America down the road to perdition! We were attacked not because we have a patriotic, America-First government, but because our foreign policy has been hijacked by Israel!
Over the next few days, this big lie about “hating our freedom” was repeated a thousand times by pundits and politicians. They were trying anything to get our minds off the real reason for the attack. The overwhelmingly obvious fact is that we had suffered this horrible carnage primarily because of our manipulation by Israel and the Jewish extremist press. To say so was called an anti-Semitic canard. Anybody daring to tell this plain truth, that we were attacked because of our Israeli policy, was called a vicious anti-Semite.
Now it appears that in the final official report on 9/11 its researchers and writers are revealed to be just as “anti-Semitic” as I supposedly am. Below is an excerpt from the Los Angeles Times. What I asked right after 9/11 is still pertinent, more than ever now that Israel and the Neocon Jewish extremists have got us in the Iraq War costing tens of thousands of dead or wounded and billions of dollars. So I ask the qustion once more as I did in 2001, “Is letting Israel control our nation’s foreign policy really worth it?”
Read the following article my friends, and know that you learn the truth first right here at www.davidduke.com — Dr. David Duke
U.S. policy on Israel key motive for effort
By Terry McDermott
LOS ANGELES TIMES
Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the man who conceived and directed the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, was motivated by his strong disagreement with American support for Israel, said the final report of the Sept. 11 commission.
Mohammed conceived the initial outline of the attack six years before its execution and brought the plan to al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden because he thought he did not have the resources to carry it out on his own.
The Sept. 11 report contains the fullest accounting of Mohammed’s overarching role from original conception to supervision of details. Bin Laden, too, was fully involved, selecting all or most of the participants, ordering the substance and the location of their training, and contributing to the timing of the attacks and the selection of targets, the report says.
The report makes a strong case that al-Qaida accomplished the attacks without any hint of state sponsorship. The report also appears to lay to rest the notion, long alluded to by administration officials including Vice President Dick Cheney, that hijacker Mohamed Atta traveled to the Czech Republic to meet an Iraqi intelligence operative in the spring of 2001.
In addition to repeating evidence that Atta was in the United States at the time, the report revealed that the Iraqi agent was not in Prague either when the meeting was alleged to have occurred…
