Why I oppose Obama as President of the United States
Barack Obama has stressed continually that he is a candidate for President for “all the people” and for the new day of a “colorblind society.” It is the identical rhetoric used by every serious candidate both Democrat and Republican. In order to win a significant percentage of the 70 percent White electorate that he needs, what else could he say? But, does Obama really mean it? Or, is it just another lie in what must qualify as the most hypocritical profession on earth: politics?
Compelling evidence shows that Barack Obama is an Afro-American whose ultimate loyalty is not to “all the people of the United States,” but primarily to his fellow African-Americans.
A candidate with racial loyalty is not extraordinary in itself, but it is quite amazing in a nation in which it is presented as the worst of crimes. Apparently though, according to the media and the political establishment, racial loyalty is only reprehensible when practiced by we White folks, the descendants of our European American forefathers.
The media has given Obama a free pass on his participation and close association with Black racist organizations and leaders. Few Americans are even aware yet of this side of Obama. Here is quick rundown of the undisputed facts:
Barack Obama is an active member of an extremist, Afro-Centrist Black church in Chicago and is admittedly very close to its Afro-centrist and unarguably (by media standards) racist pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright, Jr. Obama has frequently spoken of his closeness to Rev. Wright, Jr. and his active important participation in the church. He credits Rev. Wright and his church as having a vital role in the development of his own religious faith as well as his moral and ethical convictions.
Obama’s church proudly proclaims its quote “Blackness” and its ultimate loyalty to what it refers to as Black people, Black culture, the Black family, the Black community, Black institutions, Black values, and Black ethics.
On the church’s Internet homepage, in the first section titled, “About Us,” its first sentence denotes the church as unashamedly Black, and then goes on in the next sentence to proclaim:
…We are an African people, and remain “true to our native land,” the mother continent, the cradle of civilization.
Obama’s church promotes what it calls a Black value system and Black ethics that must be promoted wherever Blacks are gathered. It advances 12 principles
1. Commitment to God
2. Commitment to the Black Community
3. Commitment to the Black Family
4. Dedication to the Pursuit of Education
5. Dedication to the Pursuit of Excellence
6. Adherence to the Black Work Ethic
7. Commitment to Self-Discipline and Self-Respect
8. Disavowal of the Pursuit of “Middleclassness”
9. Pledge to make the fruits of all developing and acquired skills available to the Black Community
10. Pledge to Allocate Regularly, a Portion of Personal Resources for Strengthening and Supporting Black Institutions
11. Pledge allegiance to all Black leadership who espouse and embrace the Black Value System
12. Personal commitment to embracement of the Black Value System.
Although I am incorrectly labelled a racist and White supremacist by the media, I don’t think I have ever written a short article in my entire life that ever used the word White in it as much as Obama’s church uses the word Black!
Could you imagine the media reaction to a candidate who was an active member of a church proclaiming itself to be “unashamedly White,” whose commitment is to the “White community, White family, White work ethic, White institutions, and White values.”
In another section, the church’s Ten Point Vision there is not a word about commitment to America, negotiable or non-negotiable, but the pastor and all the church’s members pledge their support to a ten-point vision which includes a “non-negotiable” commitment to Africa.
4. A congregation with a non-negotiable COMMITMENT TO AFRICA.
Now those sentiments might be acceptable for a candidate named Barack Obama running for President of the Congo, but are they not preposterous for a man running for President of the United States?
In addition to his very close relationship with Rev. Wright, Obama also has a long and warm friendship with Louis Farrakhan, who is also unashamedly a Black nationalist and Afro-centrist. Although, I am not what the media makes me out to be, could you imagine the deafening media outrage if any White Democrat or Republican candidate would maintain even a cordial, even if remote friendship with me? Just a photo of President Bush or Hillary Clinton shaking my hand would cause a media storm of denunciation.
It is true that in a recent debate he was forced to condemn Farrakhan’s anti-Semitism and slavishly throw himself in subservience to the new God of Zionist supremacism. But, everyone knows that there is a tacit acknowledgment between Farrakhan and Obama that Obama must do what is necessary to get elected, and that can’t happen unless one genuflects before Jewish supremacism.
His relationship with his racist pastor, his racist church and Minister Farrakhan should be enough to raise huge criticism, yet there is another Black racist, and dedicated Black separatist with whom Obama shares an even closer relationship: his wife Michelle Obama.
Michelle Obama: Black Nationalist, Separatist
During the campaign, Mrs. Michelle Obama made a very revealing off-hand comment. The comment was so fundamental and natural to her sentiments that she couldn’t imagine that any negative response could come as a result of it.
“”For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country.” — Michelle Obama
Come again? Presumably she is proud of America for the first time in her adult life because of the popularity her African-American husband received in his quest for President of the United States.
Let’s see. Michelle Obama was never proud of America when she read of the American Founding Fathers who heroically founded this nation and the wonderful rights and liberties they enshrined in our Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights.
She never had a moment of pride when she became aware that for the first time in history the footsteps of mankind were put on the surface of the moon, and that those incredible footsteps were made by Americans.
She has never felt pride in America for the thousands of scientific, technological and medical advancements that our people created and that she benefits from every day of her life.
There are thousands of things Michelle Obama could have felt pride in as an American, but she says she has never even once felt that pride until Barack found fame and fortune.
To be completely honest, there are some things in recent years that Americans should have no pride about. They include the terribly high crime rate in America, the rates of rape, molesting and kidnapping of children, of robbery and assault, intolerable crime rates that are the worst in the Western World.
There can be no pride in the rampant drug abuse and addiction in America, the mainstreaming of pornography, the immorality and ugliness of the new American values of greed and immorality that belch out to the rest of the world from the cesspools of Hollywood and New York. No patriotic or decent American can be proud of the murderous foreign policy waged in the name of America, but one that only hurts and bankrupts our own people and our nation as it hurts much of the world. No American should be proud of the fact that our government now admits to torture of suspects. We cannot feel pride in the betrayal of our boys in a war in Iraq based on lies and the sacrifice of our men and women for Israel rather than America.
We cannot feel any pride in the sickening U.S. government support of the terrorist State of Israel, a state that has even committed terrorism against our own America in the Lavon Affair and the USS Liberty attack.
Michelle Obama has every right to be upset about the course America has taken, but for her to say that she has never in her entire adult life felt any pride for America until now reveals a deep hatred for America and European people who created her prosperous lifestyle and educational opportunities, and it is the height of ingratitude.
I can feel proud of many things as an American, but I have no pride in the massive death and agony inflicted on both North and South in the oppressive war waged by the North against the human right of the Southern people to have independence and freely choose their own government, the founding principle of America itself.
Concerning this American historical event that I loathe, the so-called “Civil War,” Michelle Obama can find no sense of pride in the enormous sacrifice America made in no small part for her people.
Michelle is not even appreciative that America gave her an undeserved, affirmative action admission into Princeton University undoubtedly over more qualified European Americans. Her senior thesis which has just now come to light shows her remarkable incompetence after four years at prestigious Princeton University. It is hard to believe that a paper that a Princeton senior would labor over for months would be so full of junior high school types of errors. But, it is not the errors we need to concentrate on here, but the personal sentiment she expresses in her thesis.
The Obama Campaign tried to keep her thesis from the public, and the Princeton Library listed it as unavailable until Election Day, Nov 5, 2008. What did they not want Americans not to know about until after the election was over?
Luckily, because of the Internet, they realized that the thesis would get out anyway, so they made it available to a pro-Obama website to cushion its impact. The mainstream press has completely ignored its Black nationalist content.
In it, Michelle Obama writes about an individual’s motivation and values. She says,
“Some individuals may place the highest value on benefiting themselves or their families. Others may value their occupational fields most highly. Others may place God before everything else. In still other instances, one’s motivation to benefit either the U.S. society, the non-White races of the world or the human species…”
She goes on to write about what she personally holds as her highest motivation. It is not God, U.S. society, or even the human species as whole. She writes:
“…there is no doubt in my mind that as a member of the Black community I was somehow obligated to this community and would utilize all of my present and future resources to benefit this community first and foremost.”
Ironically, in just a few lines after she announces that she that puts her Black community first and foremost, she writes:
“My experiences at Princeton have made me far more aware of my “Blackness” than ever before. I have found that at Princeton no matter how liberal and open-minded some of my White professors and classmates try to be toward me, I sometimes feel like a visitor on campus; as if I really don’t belong. Regardless of the circumstances under which I interact with Whites at Princeton, it often seems as if, to them, I will always be Black first and a student second.”
It is beyond me how she can fault Whites for thinking that she is precisely what she herself admits.
Michelle Obama goes on to support Black Power and separatism in her thesis:
“Stokely Carmichael [famous for his strident advocacy of “Black Power”] and Charles Hamilton’s (1967) developed definitions of separationism in their discussion of Black Power…guided me in the formulation and use of this concept in the study.”
Mrs. Obama also clearly defends separatist over integrationist Blacks:
“…a separationist is more likely to have a realistic impression of the plight of the Black lower class because of the likelihood that a separationist is more closely associated with the Black lower class than are integrationist[s]. By actually working with the Black lower class or within their communities as a result of their ideologies, a separationist may better understand the desparation [sic- typical of hundreds of errors in the paper] of their situation and feel more hopeless about a resolution as opposed to an integrationist who is ignorant to their plight.”
I have no problem with Obama’s Michelle being a Black nationalist, loyal, as she says, to the Black community “first and foremost.” I have no problem with Obama being a leading member of a church whose central mission statement says its true loyalty is to “Africa, Black people, the Black community, the Black family, black institutions, Black ethics and Black values.”
I do, however, have a problem with someone harboring these views being President of the United States, a nation with a European American majority.
Obama is able to get away with his associations and views because the American media and political establishment are an anti-White establishment constantly betraying true European American interests in almost every vital area. The establishment promotes an enforced, anti-White racial discrimination called affirmative action. It promotes the destruction of White schools and neighborhoods with forced integration, the destruction and defilement of White heritage and values in academia and media, and the literal physical destruction of our people and heritage with massive non-European immigration that will cause our children to someday walk as strangers in their own land.
The media establishment does not worry about Obama’s anti-White, Black racism, and in fact most of the Jewish Hollywood crowd that has given him millions of dollars hates European heritage more than he does. Michelle and Obama are amateurs at anti-European feeling. His Jewish extremist supporters have inherited an anti-Western hatred passed down since the time of the Roman destruction of their temple in Jerusalem.
Their important criterion is that Obama passes the litmus test of American politics: subservience to Israel. Obama has thus genuflected and bowed subserviently to the real power that greases the money and media wheels of American politics. He has already filled his campaign with the obligatory Jewish advisers, softened his position on getting out of Iraq, wants more Americans deployed around the world, beat the drums of war against Israel’s great enemy: Iran. He has promised Israel and the Jewish supremacists that they don’t have to worry about his Afro-centric church or his friendship with Farrakhan because he knows where his loyalty must ultimately lie if they will make him president. His largest single contributor, by far, is the radical Jewish, New York investment firm of Goldmann, Sachs. He has long been bought and paid for.
The fact that he can be shielded in media and politics from legitimate criticism for his views and associations is extremely symbolic of the control of those of the same affiliation as the bosses of Goldmann, Sachs.
The rise of Obama is starkly symbolic of the absence of a legitimate European American perspective in the media establishment or in the American political process.
Dr. David Duke