By Dr. Patrick Slattery — Donald Trump has released his policy paper on immigration, which contains a number of specifics. It’s proposals regarding illegal immigration would likely be effective if enacted. He also addressed legal immigration, although the policy paper does not go as far as some of his public statements on legal immigration.
For instance, the policy paper does not specifically mention family reunification, which is how the majority of legal immigrants have arrived in the United States since the enactment of the 1965 immigration law. This allows an immigrant to sponsor his wife, who can then sponsor her siblings, who can then sponsor their spouses and children, and on and on. Because whites, blacks, and American Indians who have been in this country for many generations do not have qualifying relatives overseas, this provision has favored recent immigrants, particularly Mexicans.
When politicians talk about a path to “full and equal citizenship,” they actually mean superior citizenship because even amnestied illegal aliens have the right under current law to bring in relatives under the family reunification clause. (An interesting L.A. Times article from 21 years ago makes this point, as well as some dire predictions that have come true.)
In fairness, Trump has talked about a moratorium on immigration, and that would take care of family reunification, at least for the time being.
Many of Trump’s proposals would require acts of Congress, which would not be forthcoming as long as Jewish supremacists maintain their ability to block any Congressional candidates without the Kosher stamp of approval. However, the importance of the Trump phenomenon is not so much in his possible election but in getting issues into the public debate.
Here are some of the highlights of his proposals:
Make Mexico Pay For The Wall
This is the headline proposal right at the top of the policy paper. It states “In short, the Mexican government has taken the United States to the cleaners. They are responsible for this problem, and they must help pay to clean it up.” There is a logic to this, but it would certainly be a mistake to delay the wall’s construction while we wrangle with Mexico over payment. Also, why this should be emphasized over more substantive aspects of immigration policy is unclear.
Mandatory return of all criminal aliens
It defies common sense that anyone would have to demand this in the first place. Trump points out that “The Obama Administration has released 76,000 aliens from its custody with criminal convictions since 2013 alone.”
Detention—not catch-and-release
“Illegal aliens apprehended crossing the border must be detained until they are sent home, no more catch-and-release.” Again, more common sense.
End birthright citizenship
This is legal concept of jus soli, whereby citizenship is automatically extended to anyone born in the country, and it is found primarily in the Americas and a few western European countries. A complicating factor is that it was enshrined in the 14th Amendment, so it cannot easily be ended. However, there is nothing that guarantees the right of illegal alien parents of minor American citizens to live in the United States. Trump has stated that he would keep families together by having them leave the United States together.
Increase prevailing wage for H-1Bs
These visas allow U.S. employers to employ foreign workers in specialty occupations, such as high tech jobs. Because there are so many high-tech workers from India and other poor countries who are willing to work in the United States for low wages, many IT companies rely on them to keep costs down, thus displacing American workers. When combined with the anti-white discrimination at major universities, it is a means of marginalizing European Americans. Higher wages would reduce the incentive to import foreign workers.
In conclusion, Trump’s proposals are welcome in that they have further broadened and intensified the national debate over immigration. Whether a President Trump would have the inclination or ability to follow through is a separate matter. Ultimately, no fundamental change can be expected as long as there is a Zionist lock on Congress. Still, the fact that someone like Trump can push a policy line contrary to Jewish interests and not be shut up demonstrates the possibility of a person (not Trump) with the requisite resources actually calling out Jewish supremacism, which would be the beginning of the end for Zionist domination of our country.
