The Dilemma of Jewish Supremacist “Open Borders” Policy

A pro-Israel Democratic defender of Israel lost his congressional primary bid this week against a fellow Democratic lawmaker—who won because of the growing numbers of Arabs resident in New Jersey.
Jewish Supremacists have been at the forefront of promoting an “open borders” immigration policy in America—but this policy is now leading to racial demographic shifts in America which will make it increasingly difficult for them to maintain their position.
According to an article in the slavishly-pro-Israel Washington Free Beacon, longtime New Jersey Rep. Steve Rothman was bested by Rep. Bill Pascrell, who earned 61 percent of the vote after running a campaign that rallied the Arab community to the polls over Rothman’s support of the U.S.-Israel alliance.
Pascrell will now face off in a general election against superstar Rabbi Shmuley Boteach, a pro-Israel stalwart who declared himself a Republican candidate due to what he says are President Obama’s failed policies towards Israel.
As the dust settles in New Jersey’s District 9, observers wonder if Pascrell will be able to repair his fractured relationship with the state’s pro-Israel community, which largely supported Rothman and resented Pascrell’s refusal to condemn his supporters’ charges of dual loyalty.
“It’s a heartbreaker,” Ben Chouake, president of NORPAC, a pro-Israel political action committee based in Englewood Cliffs, told the Free Beacon. “If Rothman’s positions [on Israel] hurt him anywhere it was in the Muslim community.”
Chouake said that despite the crushing loss, Rothman was the choice of pro-Israel voters.
“The disparity between the two candidates was substantial, and we chose a side,” he said. “If Pascrell is angry at some of us, that’s the deal. But we’re adults, and he’ll get over it in a few days.”
Rothman and Pascrell fought to outflank one another as the most progressive nominee—except when it came to the Jewish state.
“It’s important to remember this is a primary, and the core of the Democratic Party was voting in this primary,” said the source. “And the core of the Democratic Party in northern New Jersey sided with radical, anti-Israel beliefs over a champion of the U.S.-Israel alliance.”
The “most troubling” aspect of the race, the source added, is that “there’s no question Steve Rothman was further to the left on domestic issues than his opponent, which means Democrats did not reject Rothman on any domestic issue, but rather rejected his support of the U.S.-Israel alliance.”
In the weeks leading up to the race, Pascrell refused to condemn the rhetoric of his Arab supporters who charged that Rothman put Israel’s interests above America’s.
An Arabic campaign poster (alongside) supporting Pascrell that surfaced in the days before the election urged the “Arab diaspora community” to “elect the friend of the Arabs” and billed the race as “the most important election in the history of the [Arab] community.”
Of course, the Jewish Supremacist backers of the Democratic party still comtrol that party’s finances, and ultimately its political direction, so the NJ result is an aberration.
But it raises an interesting question: Will the Jewish Supremacists be able to keep their dominant position of power and control over a growing non-European population in America and Europe?