I am sick to death of hearing about the Trayvon Martin Case. But I have been so appalled by the naked racism in regard to the media treatment of this case, I must speak out, at the risk of being misunderstood.
I believe that any sort of violent attack initiated upon another person is wrong. At the same time, every person has the right to defend themselves or their family from physical attack.
That principle is one of the most basic of human rights. It is an inherent right from the dawn of mankind. Every man, women and child has right to defend themselves if they come under a violent, life-threatening physical attack.
I believe this is a universal right of every person, no matter of what race or heritage, religion or station of life.
I also believe with all my heart that every decent, kind and loving person on this planet opposes the harming or exploitation of any race by any other race. This is true within a nation or between nations.
As student of history I can tell you that every race, tribe and nationality has exploited or harmed other peoples.
This is true among the Asian peoples, African Peoples, Amerindian peoples, and yes, the European peoples.
It has gone on in the former Yugoslavia as it has gone on between African tribes in Rwanda, or among the Indian tribes in the Americas.
It has gone on between the broader races of mankind as well. Muslims invaded Europe, Europeans invaded the Middle East. Asia invaded Europe, Europe invaded Asia.
It is vital to point out, that perceived past wrongs are the most common excuse for horrific human rights violations and ethnic violence.
The Hutus accused the Tutsi of terrible cries as did the Tutsi the Hutus. It is safe to say that much of the world’s worst slaughtered and suppressed other groups in the name of real or supposed historical wrongs.
Human rights crimes in the Holocaust were used—and are still used—to justify horrific ethnic terror and ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.
A million men, women and children in the Iraq war were murdered in the name of human rights and freedom. What was it called—“Operation Iraqi Freedom”?
Opposition to supposed Iraqi weapons of mass destruction was used to justify the unleashing of weapons of mass destruction on a nation that actually had none!
Looking at these historical human wrongs, we can see how violence is wrong no matter how it is excused by allegations against the people who were attacked.
It is tragic and hypocritical today that some people actually justify violence, discrimination or harm against innocent Europeans today in the name of anti-racism.
And today, I will show you how the race-baiting mainstream media in the Trayvon Martin case has used a sad loss of life in debatable circumstance to create hatred and against European Americans and guilt in European Americans, and actually inflame violence against innocent European Americans.
In the name of anti-racism, the biased, factually incorrect news coverage on this case has inflamed African Americans to multiple criminal acts of racist individual and mob violence against innocent European Americans across America.
From the beginning of the case, European Americans were collectively accused of causing the death of Trayvon Martin. Without a single credible bit of evidence that race had anything to do with the shooting, a national, media-orchestrated lynch mob went after George Zimmerman, a man who is actually of mixed race.
In fact, if Hispanic George Zimmerman was in shoes of Trayvon Martin and he was shot by a White man, the media would jump at the chance to accuse the White man of racism in the same incident.
The media has guidelines not to mention the race of the criminal perpetrators and their victims. In actual fact 89 percent of Black and White cross race crimes have Black perpetrators and White victims, but 99 percent of crime reporting does not even specify the race of the criminal perpetrator except in cases where it is needed for identification purposes helpful to apprehending a fugitive.
But, in this case, where a purported White man had shot a Black man in questionable circumstances, America was treated to thousands of sensational headlines and bylines of how a White man shot an unarmed Black Teenager.
It was always accompanied by a four year old picture of Trayvon Martin as a child. The headlines could just have easily said, “Neighborhood watch captain claims he shot teenager after he was attacked.”
Above right, top: the most common picture shown of Trayvon Martin. (red shirt). The media could have more accurately retrieved the latest pictures that Trayvon himself posted in Twitter.
Below right top: is the real Trayvon Martin on Twitter. A much older, hardened Martin with his gangster look certainly does not evoke the same emotional response as the child picture of Martin shown to the world.
Now these recent gangsta pictures of Trayvon were certainly available to any news reporter or any large news conglomerate. Why would they show a picture of a innocent looking child when these more recent pictures showed anything but a child?
Pictures that evoke the violent gangsta culture. Why didn’t they point out that his Twitter gangsta racial slur name, No_Limit_ Nigga.
This is not the Martin shown to the world by the mainstream media.
Just about every American, and millions of others around the world, now know the name Trayvon Martin. George Zimmerman claimed that Martin had physically attacked him and the forensic evidence strongly supports it.
Zimmerman suffered a broken nose, two black eyes and wounds on the back of his head (illustrated above). The autopsy of Martin showed no bruises or wounds to his face or body other than the abrasions to the knuckles of his fists.
Tomorrow Part II: The Brutal Racist Crime Which Has Been Covered Up by the Controlled Media
