How Anti-Zionist Zionists Control the Discourse and Lead US to Defeat!

Precommentary by Dr. David DukeI consider Gilad Atzmon to be one of the most important voices against Zio-Globalist evil. A Jew by birth who was raised in Israel and served in the IDF, had the moral courage to clearly see the horrific crimes of the Jewish extremists against the Palestinian people. More than that he has the courage to speak out about it publicly. Furthermore, he has the intellectual honesty to make a philosophical journey that arrives at a deep understanding that Zionism is only part of the problem.

In fact, Zionism is but the latest manifestation of three thousand year old Jewish racism and supremacism. He has had the courage to even show how the Jewish Bolsheviks who murdered tens of millions of Russians as well as Central and Eastern European Christians, had a tribal motivation that set in motion their evils. For instance, he points out that the chief financier of the Bolshevik revolution in Russia was Jacob Schiff, an extreme Zionist and Jewish supremacist capitalist Banker who saw the revolution as vital for the power of the Jewish people! The Russian Revolution was not a Russian revolution of the proletariat but a Jewish tribalist invasion and strike against the Czar and the Russian people that Jews around the world so hated.

Now Atzmon exposes the fact that Jews dominated by tribalist loyalty to the Jewish people rather than the true interests of Palestinians (or anyone else) —  are trying to control anti-Zionist discourse that exposes the supremacist nature of not just Zionism but what is referred to as the Jewish religion and culture. In the article below he quotes a supposedly anti-Zionist Blog, MondoWeiss. It will now censor any discussion of Jewish supremacism, racism and misanthropic extremism, despite the fact that these things are critical to understanding both Jewish history and the unholy power of Jewish supremacists over the media, politics and finance of the Western World. This is a must read! Dr. David Duke

What shall we not talk about today? 

Introduction by Gilad Atzmon: As I explained in my latest book The Wandering Who, Jewish identity politics is driven by different tribal narratives. In many cases it is intolerant and even openly hostile towards open exchange and universal ideologies. This applies the Zionist and ‘anti’ Zionist alike.

The Jewish internet outlet Mondoweiss initially presented itself as a progressive pro-Palestine journal but it didn’t take long before it admitted to be a fig leaf dedicated to Judeo-centric gate-keeping. This week Mondoweiss changed its comment policy. No longer will it allow any criticism of Jewish politics, culture and identity politics.

But here’s the good news: Years ago, when some of us decided to write about the Jewish state in the context of Jewish culture, the AZZ (anti-Zionist Zionists) dismissed us as an ‘irrelevant marginal voice’. This week however, Mondoweiss admitted that we are actually “a lot of people” and “a significant part of the community.” A community Mondoweiss attempts to silence.

In the following piece Aletho News added the names of those who oppose freedom of speech and open discourse. These people have publicly disavowed me because of my recognizing the clear connection between Jewish identity politics and Zionist ideology. I’ll admit that I am actually happy to be at the centre of this battle for truth and liberation.

In the list you will find many Jewish activists. Yet, one may wonder why Palestinians such as Ali Abunimah and Omar Barghouti have so compromised their credibility by joining such a list and it would be interesting to find out what they got in return. But it would be even more interesting to find out what principle they were willing to sacrifice. Apparently, giving up on the Palestinian Right of Return was something they were quite happy to give away.

What shall we not talk about today?



“. . . a significant part of the community wants to talk about Israeli policy in the context of Jewish history and Jewish identity, and do so in a highly critical manner. Clearly a lot of people, including many in our community, want to have these conversations and regard them as necessary to resolving the Middle East conflict. We don’t. We are tired of serving as a platform for this discussion, including in the comment section, and don’t see the conversation as a productive one. From here on out, the Mondoweiss comment section will no longer serve as a forum to pillory Jewish culture and religion as the driving factors in Israeli and US policy.

We are making this change because this discussion makes for a toxic, often racist, discourse, and scares off others who would otherwise be drawn to the issues this site concerns itself with.”

Xymphora responds:

I look forward to the ‘Roots of Slavery in the Old South’ forum, which consists entirely of a discussion of the sufferings of the slaveholders, and how their actions derived entirely from the racism experienced by their Scots-Irish forefathers.

Of course, the deeper issue is that Zionism is based, not in Jewish suffering or the mythology of a universal irrational hatred of Jews, but in Jewish violent group supremacism.  This is easy to see in that Zionism waxes in times of Jewish group dominance (like now), and wanes in the relatively rare times of Jewish group oppression. The lite Zionists are always more skittish about hiding Jewish supremacism than the hard-core Zionists.