Politics

H. Millard on the 'Blending' of U.S., Canada and Mexico

White Buck Shoes and the North American Union

By H. Millard

This past week, Pat Boone stomped his white bucks all over George Bush’s so-called North American Union scheme.

In his column on the WorldNetDaily Website, Boone wrote about his opposition to this screwball plan to combine the U.S., Mexico and Canada into one vast community with no meaningful borders.

After owning up to being a supporter of Bush, Boone then wrote a version of what many of Bush’s apologists have been writing and saying: “But I’ve been mystified by the concessions that [President Bush has] made to Mexico, the strange reticence to address our porous borders and the surging problem of illegal aliens.”

Mr. Boone shouldn’t be mystified. I’ve been writing about Bush’s scheme for years. Still, it seems that some supporters of Bush are like the O.J. jury. They just refuse to believe what seems clear to others.

These days, more than a few of the Bush apologists are twisting themselves into pretzels trying to make sense of Bush’s open borders and North American Union plans. Many of them think–or, maybe they’re just trying to convince themselves–that it’s some sort of aberration or lapse of judgment on Bush’s part. “Why, he’s just getting bad advice. Yes, that’s it. He’s a swell guy, but he’s just getting bad advice.” Ho hum.

I don’t see it that way.

If I’m right, Bush’s push to merge the U.S. with Mexico and Canada is not an aberration or lapse of judgment. This is the real George Bush. This is the man behind the just-folks attitude and smiles.

And, unfortunately, if I am right, the truth of what Bush is all about is much worse than what many believe. Much worse. It’s not just about economics. It’s about genetics.

For more

Staff